US Considers Military Action Against Iran Amid Rising Tensions
The Trump administration is reportedly considering a range of military actions against Iran, from air power and missile strikes to sustained operations in the digital space, psychological warfare, and influence campaigns, according to multiple sources. However, the scale of the potential operation is expected to be limited, and there are concerns over its possible implications on regional stability and global oil markets.
Background and Context
This development comes amid rising tensions between the US and Iran, with President Trump promising aid to the Iranian protesters and considering options to bend the regime using psychological warfare, according to La Repubblica. As per Folha de S.Paulo, the President was informed about a wide range of military devices and secret actions potentially to be used in Iran.
Despite these considerations, the US's options are limited due to the recent drawdown of troops and ships that have shifted to the Caribbean, as reported by TASS. The Guardian also notes that any military action would be unlikely to succeed, given the history of US intervention in the region and without military pre-positioning.
Key Developments
As per reports from TASS, the US is seeking to manufacture a pretext for military intervention, a claim that Tehran’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Amir-Saeid Iravani, has warned threatens Iran's sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national security.
US allies in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Qatar, have been privately urging the US not to launch a military strike on Iran, fearing it could trigger severe regional instability and disrupt the global oil market, according to the Wall Street Journal as quoted by RT.
Implications and Reactions
The potential military intervention has sparked fears among Washington's Middle East allies, who are bracing for what they fear could be catastrophic
consequences, as reported by the South China Morning Post. Le Monde also raises the question of Washington's hesitation on the objective of an intervention, whether to decapitate the Tehran regime, annihilate its repressive apparatus, or force it to surrender on the nuclear issue.
Meanwhile, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has stated that his country is ready for war but also for dialogue, as reported by Al Jazeera English.
Conclusion
The current situation presents a complex scenario with the US considering various military options against Iran while facing limitations and warnings from allies about the potential consequences. Despite these considerations, the CIA warns that the regime still appears solid, as reported by Corriere della Sera. As tensions continue to rise, the global community will be closely watching the developments in this geopolitical chess game.