'Double Tap' Strike: US Military's Controversial War on Drugs Faces Global Scrutiny

'Double Tap' Strike: US Military's Controversial War on Drugs Faces Global Scrutiny

Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth Under Fire as Ethical and Legal Questions Surround the Latest Anti-Drug Strikes

Story: US Anti-Drug Strikes on Venezuelan Vessel Spark Global Outrage and Legal Debates

Story Summary

The US military's 'double tap' strike on a suspected Venezuelan drug vessel, which resulted in the killing of survivors, has sparked global controversy and raised serious legal and ethical concerns. Despite the outrage, the Trump administration continues to defend the strikes as necessary in the war against drugs, while lawmakers, legal experts, and human rights advocates demand increased transparency and accountability.

Full Story

Controversial US Anti-Drug Strikes Spark Legal and Ethical Debates

The controversial double tap strike by the US military on a suspected Venezuelan drug-boat, which resulted in the killing of survivors from the initial attack, has triggered global outrage and scrutiny. The second strike, which took place on September 2, was reportedly authorized by Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth, leading to a firestorm of controversy and raising critical legal questions.

Background and Context

The US military has been actively conducting strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean, a mission that Hegseth approved. The strikes are part of an ongoing campaign against narco-terrorists, with the latest incident marking the 22nd such strike, according to Fox News. However, the sequence of events following the initial attack on a vessel carrying 11 people has raised serious legal and ethical concerns.

Key Developments and Details

After the first attack failed to kill everyone onboard the boat, a second strike was carried out. This series of events was first reported by The Washington Post and subsequently confirmed by the White House. The presence of a military lawyer during the decision-making process for the second strike has led to a sharper focus on the legality of the action.

Despite the controversy, the US military continued its strike campaign, with another attack on a suspected drug vessel in the Eastern Pacific, killing four men. The US Southern Command shared the video of this strike on social media, adding further fuel to the ongoing debates.

Reactions and Implications

The incidents have prompted bipartisan congressional oversight and provoked outrage from both human rights advocates and policy experts. Democratic representative Jim Himes, after viewing the footage in a classified briefing, described it as one of the most troubling scenes he's seen in public service. The Guardian noted that the Pentagon's Law of War manual clearly prohibits such attacks, raising questions about the justification of the entire campaign.

In the midst of the controversy, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth sparked a backlash by sharing a cartoon meme featuring a children's character attacking drug traffickers. The meme was seen as an attempt to trivialize the seriousness of the ongoing controversy.

Current Status

The Trump administration, while under scrutiny, has defended the strikes as necessary in the war against drugs. Hegseth has denied giving an initial order to ensure that everyone on board was killed. However, he confirmed that he watched the first strike live but did not see any survivors amid the fire and smoke.

President Trump has supported the release of the video footage of the second strike. The White House maintains that the strikes were conducted in self-defense and in accordance with the law of armed conflict. However, legal experts, lawmakers, and human rights advocates continue to challenge this narrative, demanding more transparency and accountability from the administration. The debate over these controversial strikes continues, with more details expected to emerge in the coming weeks.

Source Articles