Inaugural Meeting of Trump's 'Board of Peace' Raises Questions and Controversy
The inaugural meeting of President Donald Trump's 'Board of Peace', scheduled for February 19, is set to take place amid significant controversy and skepticism from global partners. The initiative, aiming to play a leading role in managing the Gaza crisis, has seen a mixed response from the international community, with several key nations choosing to observe rather than commit to membership.
Background and Context
The 'Board of Peace' was established by President Trump as an initiative to discuss the future of the Gaza Strip and to pledge funds towards rebuilding the region. The board's inaugural meeting clashes with a rescheduled United Nations Security Council meeting to discuss Gaza and the West Bank, originally set for the same day. The UN council has emphasized its role as the appropriate body to manage global crises, further fueling the debate around the newly established board.
Key Developments and Details
While some countries, like South Korea, have pledged cautious support by attending as observers, others have outright declined the invitation. Notably, the Vatican, Mexico, and major European allies have chosen not to participate, citing concerns over the board's US-dominated structure, global ambitions, and lack of accountability.
As reported by Al Jazeera English, Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed her decision to decline the invitation, reaffirming her long-standing position with Gaza and Palestine. The Vatican echoed this sentiment, stating that efforts to handle crisis situations should be managed by the United Nations.
Despite the absence of several key players, Asian and Middle Eastern partners are expected to line up in Washington, with around 20 participants confirmed. Notably, Poland will be represented by the head of the Bureau for International Policy, Minister Marcin Przydacz, attending solely as an observer.
Implications and Reactions
The 'Board of Peace' has already raised more than $5bn for the reconstruction of Gaza, according to The Guardian. However, this has been met with criticism, with claims that the board is a personal vehicle for President Trump, removing any accountability to Palestinians or the United Nations.
Hamas has warned the board, stating that the war of genocide against the Strip is still ongoing
, urging the board not to act as a 'cover'. This alarming statement, coupled with the skepticism and controversy surrounding the board, has led to a tense atmosphere ahead of the inaugural meeting.
Conclusion and Current Status
As the inaugural meeting approaches, the 'Board of Peace' faces significant challenges and criticism. With key nations choosing to observe rather than participate, and the United Nations Security Council emphasizing its role in managing global crises, the board's future effectiveness and credibility remain uncertain. As the international community watches, the outcome of this inaugural meeting could shape the future of the Gaza Strip and international crisis management.