First Round of US-Iran Nuclear Talks Ends on a Positive Note, Paving the Way for Future Dialogue

First Round of US-Iran Nuclear Talks Ends on a Positive Note, Paving the Way for Future Dialogue

Amidst deep mistrust and heightened tensions, the initial round of talks focused on Iran's nuclear program and US sanctions, with further discussions planned.

Story: US-Iran Indirect Nuclear Talks in Oman Conclude with Intentions for Further Negotiations

Story Summary

The first round of indirect nuclear negotiations between the US and Iran in Oman concluded with no significant breakthrough but with intentions for further talks, marking a crucial step towards averting potential conflict. Despite the announcement of new US sanctions against Iran immediately after the talks, both sides expressed a shared consensus on the need to continue dialogue, emphasizing the importance of calm negotiations free from pressure and threats.

Full Story

US-Iran Nuclear Talks in Oman Conclude with Plans for Another Round

The first round of indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran, held in Muscat, Oman, concluded on Friday with no significant progress but with plans for another round of talks, according to various sources. Despite the threat of war and a growing military siege by the Trump administration against Iran, the talks have been described as a 'positive' and 'good start' by officials.

Background and Context

The talks were marked by deep mistrust and heightened tensions, following last year's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities by the US and the subsequent military buildup in the Middle East. However, the negotiations were considered a crucial step towards averting a potential war between the two countries.

The delegations, led by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, met indirectly in Muscat. The talks focused primarily on finding a framework for negotiations and clarifying the thinking of both sides, with Oman acting as a mediator.

Key Developments and Details

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the negotiations, both sides intend to continue the talks and have retreated to consult with their leaders. Araghchi said, After a long period without dialogue, our viewpoints were conveyed, and our concerns were expressed. It was a good start, but its continuation depends on consultations in our respective capitals and deciding on how to proceed.

The talks were reportedly focused solely on Iran's nuclear energy program and the lifting of US sanctions. However, shortly after the negotiations concluded, the US announced a new round of sanctions against Tehran, accusing them of being linked to Iran's nuclear program.

Implications and Reactions

The talks have been met with varying reactions. The Persian Gulf Cooperation Council (PGCC) welcomed the negotiations, and officials have described the talks as 'positive'. However, some reports suggest that Iran will strike American bases in the Middle East if the US attacks the country, indicating a deep mistrust in the relations between Washington and Tehran.

Despite the stern warning, Araghchi has insisted that any agreement on Iran's nuclear program can only be reached through calm dialogue free of pressure and threats. He referred to the Muscat negotiations as a good start and emphasized that both sides shared a consensus on the need to continue the talks.

Conclusion

The indirect talks between Iran and the US have concluded with plans for another round, the location of which is yet to be specified. The current round of nuclear talks differs fundamentally from negotiations held before the 12-day war in June 2025, according to Araghchi, citing lessons learned from both diplomacy and conflict over the past year.

The negotiations are seen as a crucial step towards easing tensions and averting a potential war, but with the announcement of new US sanctions against Iran immediately following the talks, it remains to be seen how the future discussions will unfold.

Source Articles