US-led Ceasefire Efforts in Gaza Face Controversy, Aid Blockade and Tensions Persist
A series of recent developments have raised questions about the effectiveness of the US-led ceasefire in Gaza. While the US has claimed an increase in aid into Gaza, this has been disputed by Palestinians and aid organizations, who allege an engineered starvation. Moreover, the US has been reported to be sidelining Israel in decision-making at Gaza ceasefire HQ, which has drawn criticism from Israeli officials.
Background and Context
The US-brokered ceasefire, which came into effect on October 10, intended to halt violence in Gaza. However, the ceasefire has been described as a strategic cover for Israel to continue its military operations with reduced international scrutiny, according to Tehran Times. Since the ceasefire, the Palestinian health ministry reports that 241 people have been killed and 619 wounded.
Key Developments
Despite the alleged increase in aid, British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has urged for all aid routes to be opened and for aid restrictions to be lifted immediately. Cooper cited seeing warehouses full of aid still waiting to get into Gaza even though families are still going hungry.
In addition, the World Bank has backed a US-drafted UN Security Council resolution that would authorise a two-year mandate for a transitional governance body for Gaza, potentially addressing issues such as economic recovery and reconstruction.
Controversy Over International Stabilization Force
There has been controversy over the proposed international stabilization force in Gaza. Israel has insisted on keeping Turkey out of Gaza, with an Israeli government spokesperson stating there will be no Turkish boots on the ground.
However, Turkey has been working to ensure safe passage for some 200 civilians trapped in tunnels in Gaza.
Moreover, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has expressed hesitancy to join the force, citing a lack of clear framework. This has raised further concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed force.
Implications and Reactions
These developments have resulted in mixed reactions. While the US claims that it is leading a historic effort to address the critical needs of Gazans, Palestinians and aid organisations argue otherwise, stating that Israel has engineered starvation
in Gaza.
The sidelining of Israel in decision-making at Gaza ceasefire HQ has also drawn criticism from Israeli officials. The integration of the US-led Civil-Military Coordination Centre (CMCC) in overseeing aid into Gaza, replacing Israel's role, has been a contentious issue.
Conclusion
The situation in Gaza remains highly volatile, with ongoing tensions and controversy surrounding the US-led ceasefire and aid efforts. As the international community grapples with the complex issue of peacekeeping and aid delivery in the region, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact the future stability of Gaza.