US Supreme Court Rules Against Trump's Tariffs
In a significant test of presidential authority, the US Supreme Court ruled on Friday that President Donald Trump overstepped his executive power by imposing sweeping tariffs on global imports under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The 6-3 decision delivered a blow to a cornerstone of Trump's economic agenda, with the court concluding that the power to impose tariffs rests with Congress, not the President.
Background and Context
The dispute centered on Trump's use of the IEEPA to enforce his Liberation Day
tariffs on most countries, including a 10% global tariff and higher, so-called reciprocal
tariffs on certain nations. In April, Trump declared the US trade deficit a national emergency,
and the administration's lawyers cited that declaration as the legal basis for invoking the IEEPA.
Key Developments
The Court's decision was led by Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote that the Constitution vests the power to impose tariffs and taxes in Congress alone. Our task today is to decide only whether the power to ‘regulate… importation,’ as granted to the President in IEEPA, embraces the power to impose tariffs,
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the ruling. It does not.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented against the majority opinion. The ruling was seen as a surprise given the conservative-leaning bench of the Supreme Court.
Implications and Reactions
Following the ruling, President Trump responded by announcing a new 10% global tariff, vowing to sign an executive order using another piece of legislation, the Trade Act of 1974, to impose additional tariffs. Trump called the Supreme Court's decision a disgrace,
while also giving grudging praise to the liberal justices on the court for their loyalty
to Democrats.
Democrats quickly applauded the Supreme Court's decision, labeling Trump's tariff strategy an unfair tax
on Americans, despite previous support within the party for using tariffs as leverage in trade disputes. On the other hand, some Republicans quietly celebrated the Supreme Court's ruling, viewing it as a means of preserving Congress's power over tariffs and upholding the separation of powers.
Current Status and Conclusion
Despite the ruling, global businesses and governments remain uncertain about what comes next. The White House has indicated that it will replace the levies by other – potentially more cumbersome – means. Moreover, tariff collections under the Trump administration have surged to historic highs, with January alone bringing in $30.4 billion.
This ruling, while a significant setback for Trump's aggressive trade policies, does not mark a permanent reduction in presidential power. President Trump could restore many of his tariffs under different laws. The decision, however, underscores the need for cooperation between the president and Congress in managing foreign affairs, and presents a notable check on presidential powers.